Skip to content

Murdoch Lawyers

Juanita Maiden Recognised as a Leading Wills & Estates Litigation Lawyer

Murdoch Lawyers are proud to announce that Senior Associate, Juanita Maiden has been recognised in the 2020 Doyle’s Guide as a Leading Wills & Estates Litigation Lawyer in Queensland. In addition to Juanita receiving this personal recognition, Murdoch Lawyers is listed in the Leading Qld Firms for Estate Litigation 2020, and this acknowledgement is testament to the depth of talent in our team, lead by Director, Craig Shepherd with Senior Associates, Juanita Maiden, Anneliese Seymour and Barry Chappell.
Director, Leanne Matthewson added “We are stoked that Juanita’s dedication and client service has been rewarded for the second year in a row with her being recognised in the Doyle’s Guide Wills & Estates Litigation Rankings. We acknowledge Juanita’s individual contribution and success which is supported by a strong team at Murdoch Lawyers. These Doyle’s Guide listings demonstrate why other lawyers as well as our network of accountants and financial planners continue to endorse Murdoch Lawyers by referring their valued clients to us. Our continued focus is to provide practical solutions within a timeframe that is acceptable to our clients and at a price which they feel delivers good value”.
The post Juanita Maiden Recognised as a Leading Wills & Estates Litigation Lawyer appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

UPDATE: Murdoch Lawyers & COVID-19

Like many Queensland businesses, the team at Murdoch Lawyers are returning to the office. Some staff continue to work remotely and will do so for the immediate future.
To maintain the health and wellbeing of our team, our clients and the community we have implemented changes to protect everyone and minimise the risk of transmission of COVID-19. Changes include minor renovations to increase the size of meeting rooms to ensure we comply with social distancing requirements.
Cleaning schedules have been increased and hand sanitiser provided for all staff and visitors to use when entering the office. Meeting room tables and chairs will be sanitised after each use, even the pens are cleaned! If you do need to visit our office, we ask that you sanitise your hands upon entering and adhere to 1.5m social distance requirements.
We are fully operational and available during business hours by phone, email or Zoom meetings. Face to face meetings can be scheduled when required but we continue to follow government guidelines and recommend that meetings be conducted over the phone or via video conferencing whenever possible. We are happy to help arrange these for you.
Restrictions may have eased but we will remain vigilant while continuing to work with you.
Please call our office on 1300 068 736 if you have any questions or concerns.
The post UPDATE: Murdoch Lawyers & COVID-19 appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

New measures to assist Domestic Violence Victims

Unfortunately, in domestic violence situations, it can be the case that the perpetrator may take the victim’s identification documents and/or prevent them from holding their own bank account. This prevents the victim from opening a bank account in their sole name and regain their financial independence.
In response, AUSTRAC has developed ways to better assist victims of domestic violence seeking to regain independence after leaving a domestically violent relationship. This includes allowing flexibility through the verification of identity process by allowing other documents to be accepted, whilst also taking steps to prevent fraud or terrorism risks.
Some examples of the flexibility that may be offered are as follows:

Accepting reference statements from a reliable independent person that confirms the victim’s identity. This can be a religious leader, police officer, current employer or health practitioner etc. Such a statement will require the person to provide details personal details of the victim (date of birth, address, full name, etc), how they know the victim, including how long and a description of the current circumstances including if they are aware of any DV Order.
Accepting photos of identification documents to open the account with time to allow the victim afterwards to provide the originals.

AUSTRAC has provided some helpful examples and further information about who might be able to provide reference statements on their website: – https://www.austrac.gov.au/business/how-comply-and-report-guidance-and-resources/customer-identification-and-verification/identifying-customers-who-dont-have-conventional-forms-id
A victim of domestic violence needs both social support and legal advice so that they can consider their options with respect to their legal protections, including making an application for a Domestic and Family Violence Protection Order.
For social support, we recommend clients start by calling 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732), or the Domestic Violence Action Centre (07 3816 3000) if they are based in the Toowoomba and Ipswich areas. These are free government-funded organisations that can provide valuable support and social services, including counselling and safety planning.
For a confidential discussion to consider your legal options, call  the Family Law team at Murdoch Lawyers today on 1300 068 736.
The post New measures to assist Domestic Violence Victims appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Minimum Wage Increase 1.75% Staggered Across 2020/2021

The Fair Work Commission has completed the annual wage review and determined that in FY20/21, minimum wages in Modern Awards will increase by 1.75%.  The increase will apply from either 1 July 2020, 1 November 2020 or 1 February 2021, depending on the award.
Which Modern Awards increase by 1.75% on 1 July 2020?
Minimum wages for the below awards will increase by 1.75% from the start of the first full pay period on or after 1 July 2020.

Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2020 MA000115
Aged Care Award 2010 MA000018
Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2020 MA000098
Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2020 MA000019
Cemetery Industry Award 2020 MA000070
Children’s Services Award 2010 MA000120
Cleaning Services Award 2020 MA000022
Corrections and Detention (Private Sector) Award 2020 MA000110
Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2020 MA000076
Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2010 MA000077
Electrical Power Industry Award 2020 MA000088
Fire Fighting Industry Award 2020 MA000111
Funeral Industry Award 2010 MA000105
Gas Industry Award 2020 MA000061
Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2020 MA000027
Medical Practitioners Award 2020 MA000031
Nurses Award 2010 MA000034
Pharmacy Industry Award 2020 MA000012
Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010 MA000100
State Government Agencies Award 2020 MA000121
Water Industry Award 2020 MA000113

Which Modern Awards increase by 1.75% on 1 November 2020?
Minimum wages for the below awards will increase by 1.75% from the start of the first full pay period on or after 1 November 2020.

 Aluminium Industry Award 2020 MA000060
Animal Care and Veterinary Services Award 2020 MA000118
Aquaculture Industry Award 2020 MA000114
Architects Award 2020 MA000079
Asphalt Industry Award 2020 MA000054
Australian Government Industry Award 2016 MA000153
Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2010 MA000001
Book Industry Award 2020 MA000078
Broadcasting, Recorded Entertainment and Cinemas Award 2010 MA000091
Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010 MA000020
Business Equipment Award 2020 MA000021
Car Parking Award 2020 MA000095
Cement, Lime and Quarrying Award 2020 MA000055
Clerks—Private Sector Award 2020 MA000002
Coal Export Terminals Award 2020 MA000045
Concrete Products Award 2020 MA000056
Contract Call Centres Award 2020 MA000023
Cotton Ginning Award 2020 MA000024
Dredging Industry Award 2020 MA000085
Educational Services (Post-Secondary Education) Award 2020 MA000075
Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2010 MA000025
Food, Beverage and Tobacco Manufacturing Award 2010 MA000073
Gardening and Landscaping Services Award 2020 MA000101
Graphic Arts, Printing and Publishing Award 2010 MA000026
Higher Education Industry-Academic Staff-Award 2020 MA000006
Higher Education Industry-General Staff-Award 2020 MA000007
Horticulture Award 2010 MA000028
Hydrocarbons Field Geologists Award 2020 MA000064
Hydrocarbons Industry (Upstream) Award 2020 MA000062
Joinery and Building Trades Award 2010 MA000029
Journalists Published Media Award 2020 MA000067
Labour Market Assistance Industry Award 2020 MA000099
Legal Services Award 2020 MA000116
Local Government Industry Award 2020 MA000112
Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 MA000010
Marine Towage Award 2020 MA000050
Maritime Offshore Oil and Gas Award 2020 MA000086
Market and Social Research Award 2020 MA000030
Meat Industry Award 2020 MA000059
Mining Industry Award 2020 MA000011
Miscellaneous Award 2020 MA000104
Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010 MA000032
Oil Refining and Manufacturing Award 2020 MA000072
Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2020 MA000063
Pastoral Award 2010 MA000035
Pest Control Industry Award 2020 MA000097
Pharmaceutical Industry Award 2010 MA000069
Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010 MA000036
Port Authorities Award 2020 MA000051
Ports, Harbours and Enclosed Water Vessels Award 2020 MA000052
Poultry Processing Award 2020 MA000074
Premixed Concrete Award 2020 MA000057
Professional Diving Industry (Industrial) Award 2020 MA000108
Professional Employees Award 2020 MA000065
Rail Industry Award 2020 MA000015
Real Estate Industry Award 2020 MA000106
Road Transport (Long Distance Operations) Award 2020 MA000039
Road Transport and Distribution Award 2020 MA000038
Salt Industry Award 2010 MA000107
Seafood Processing Award 2020 MA000068
Seagoing Industry Award 2020 MA000122
Security Services Award 2020 MA000016
Silviculture Award 2020 MA000040
Stevedoring Industry Award 2020 MA000053
Storage Services and Wholesale Award 2020 MA000084
Sugar Industry Award 2020 MA000087
Supported Employment Services Award 2020 MA000103
Surveying Award 2020 MA000066
Telecommunications Services Award 2010 MA000041
Textile, Clothing, Footwear and Associated Industries Award 2010 MA000017
Timber Industry Award 2010 MA000071
Transport (Cash in Transit) Award 2020 MA000042
Waste Management Award 2020 MA000043
Wool Storage, Sampling and Testing Award 2010 MA000044

Which Modern Awards increase by 1.75% on 1 February 2021?
Minimum wages for the below awards will increase by 1.75% from the start of the first full pay period on or after 1 February 2021.

 Air Pilots Award 2020 MA000046
Aircraft Cabin Crew Award 2020 MA000047
Airline Operations-Ground Staff Award 2020 MA000048
Airport Employees Award 2020 MA000049
Alpine Resorts Award 2020 MA000092
Amusement, Events and Recreation Award 2020 MA000080
Commercial Sales Award 2020 MA000083
Dry Cleaning and Laundry Industry Award 2020 MA000096
Fast Food Industry Award 2010 MA000003
Fitness Industry Award 2010 MA000094
General Retail Industry Award 2010 MA000004
Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010 MA000005
Horse and Greyhound Training Award 2020 MA000008
Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2020 MA000009
Live Performance Award 2010 MA000081
Mannequins and Models Award 2020 MA000117
Marine Tourism and Charter Vessels Award 2020 MA000093
Nursery Award 2020 MA000033
Professional Diving Industry (Recreational) Award 2020 MA000109
Racing Clubs Events Award 2010 MA000013
Racing Industry Ground Maintenance Award 2020 MA000014
Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010 MA000058
Restaurant Industry Award 2020 MA000119
Sporting Organisations Award 2020 MA000082
Travelling Shows Award 2020 MA000102
Vehicle Repair, Services and Retail Award 2020 MA000089
Wine Industry Award 2010 MA000090

Other modern award changes
Recently, other changes to many modern awards have been introduced, replacing annualised salary provisions with much more onerous and prescriptive ‘annualised wage’ provisions.
What should employers do?
Employers should:

check the rate of pay they currently pay their employees;
adjust budgets;
check employment agreements and adjust where necessary;
apply the minimum wage from the relevant period; and
if you pay annualised wages ensure the annualised wage agreements comply with the recent changes to the Modern Awards.

Getting help
If you need assistance implementing the award increase or complying with the new modern award annualised wage provisions please contact:

Matt Bell on 07 4616 9860 or [email protected]
Suzanne Wishart on 07 3164 1121 or [email protected]

The post Minimum Wage Increase 1.75% Staggered Across 2020/2021 appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Developments in Koala Conservation Areas

In response to a 2015 report that showed that koala numbers in South East Queensland have decreased by 50-80% in key habitat areas over the last 20 years, the Queensland Government amended its planning framework on 7 February 2020 to provide further protection to koala habitat areas in South East Queensland.
As part of this process the Government has identified Koala Habitat Areas and Koala Priority Areas – and has updated its vegetation mapping to now also include these.
Development Within Koala Priority Areas
Clearing of Koala Habitat areas within Koala Priority Areas is prohibited.
Development in Koala Priority Areas that doesn’t involve clearing Koala Habitat Areas must now also be assessed (by the Council) for koala conservation outcomes (e.g. safe koala movement).
Development that Proposes to Clear Koala Habitat Areas Not in a Koala Priority Area
For consistency (as the Government’s Report determined that previous koala planning provisions were complex and inconsistent due to differences in local government mapping, development assessment triggers and conditions), the State Government will now be responsible for assessing development that proposes to clear Koala Habitat Areas outside Koala Priority Areas – assessing the proposed development in accordance with a new State Code for Development in South East Queensland Koala Habitat Areas.
Exceptions
A number of exemptions to clearing Koala Habitat Areas however apply – including for example:

authorised clearing under a development approval for applications made prior to 7 February 2020;
clearing Category X vegetation under a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation made before 7 February 2020;
a one-off 500m2 allowance per lot to build a house (if no other existing cleared area is available);
clearing for a necessary fence or road (with a maximum width of clearing of 5 metres if the lot is less than 5ha and a maximum width of 10 metres if the lot is over 5ha) in certain vegetation category areas;
clearing for safety – e.g. emergency response, removing dangerous trees and maintaining firebreaks adjacent to infrastructure;
certain types of assessment (generally for State or public purposes rather than private development); and
low risk clearing in accordance with relevant Assessable Development Clearing Codes (which have also been updated to address koala conservation issues) subject to the limits in the Codes.

It is also important to remember that clearing of vegetation in Queensland is regulated not only by the State Government, but also the Australian Government and the relevant local Government’s local laws and planning schemes, and that each of these must be considered before commencing any clearing.
Please feel free to contact our Property Law team if you have any queries in relation to the new koala conservation provisions and how they may affect your property.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post Developments in Koala Conservation Areas appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Stand Down of Employees

With many employees stood down as a result of the impact of COVID-19 disputes will inevitably arise regarding the validity of the stand down and whether an employer should pay the employee for the period of the stand down.
A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission in Marson v Coral Princess Cruises (N.Q.) Pty Ltd (C2020/1936) provides some guidance on how the Fair Work Commission will consider in these disputes.
Mr Marson was employed as a Marine Superintendent by Coral Princess Cruises who operated a cruise line providing tourist cruises. Due to government regulations to prevent the spread of COVID-19 it was no longer able to operate these cruises and he was stood down on 26 March 2020. He was one of some 50% of staff stood down.
The employer relied on s 524 of the Fair Work Act 2009 which relevantly provides that an employer may stand down an employee during a period in which the employee cannot be usefully employed because of a stoppage of work for any cause for which the employer cannot reasonably be held responsible.
The key issue was whether a genuine stoppage of work occurs when an employer’s business is not trading but there still exists some limited functions that can be performed. The Commission found that there was a genuine stoppage of work due to the inability of the employer to engage in its primary function as there was no intervening cause between the government restrictions on travel and the employer’s decision to stand down.
The term ‘useful employment’ was considered a question of fact which necessarily involved consideration of the conduct of the employer. It was found that if the employer had acted in good faith that this would be a factual consideration in favour of the employer as notions of fairness were part of the consideration.
The Commission noted that where an employer is acting out of self-preservation it is difficult to contemplate how their actions would be outside the realms of good faith or fairness.
The test of useful employment was found to involve two considerations:

An assessment of the work available-is their useful work and how many employees are required to perform that useful work?
A general analysis of the conduct of the employer against notions of good faith and fairness must be undertaken

and in resolving that question regard could be had to the economic consequences to the employer.
It was found the employer’s business had no income yet was incurring significant costs in fixed overheads. It had stood down casuals, ceased hiring, obtained a 6 month extension on all vessel survey requirements and all maintenance had been either extended out to the end of 2021 or put on hold.
The Commission found that the fact the stand down was widespread, impacted employees from all areas of the business as well as another employee from Mr Mason’s department, indicated that the actions were considered and fair. It accepted that based on the evidence there was insufficient useful work for him to perform. It found that it could not be said that there was a contemplated net benefit in retaining Mr Mason as a large number of his tasks were so reduced in capacity that they can be performed by other members of the Marine Department. The evidence showed the employer had made the decision to stand down with due consideration and it acted upon proper principles and in good faith.
It was determined the employer had made a genuine attempt to salvage the business in the face of ‘crushing financial conditions’ and to disregard economic considerations in such a time would be contrary to the case law and notions of fairness.
Takeaways
If an employer has acted reasonably and is able to demonstrate:

a stoppage a work due to COVID-19;
due assessment of the business’s work needs;
reasonable application of the stand downs across the business; and
economic necessity for the stand down

it is likely to be able to successfully defend any challenge to its stand down.
The post Stand Down of Employees appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

How a Financial Neutral can Assist Separating Clients with Difficult Decisions

Experience has shown that the lack of information causes some clients great difficulty with making life changing decisions.
An experienced financial neutral can help clients in many ways, also making the Lawyer’s job easier. Over the past 20 years Brad Corby (consultant and Founder of Divorce Solutions) has adapted a simple 3 step approach: Strategy/Structure/Solution
Strategy:
This involves understanding the client’s needs and objectives.
Clients will often say; “my lawyer said I should get 60%”. Further questions such as the following should be asked:

“what does 60% look like?”
“Where do you and the children live?”
“What does your house look like?”
“What type of car do you drive?
“What school do your children attend?”
“Do you have to work full or part time?”

A financial neutral is well trained in the process of uncovering and identifying the client’s real needs and wants.
Once the Strategic vision is clear, financial analysis can be used to identify settlement opportunities.
Structure:
Separation is one of the best times to consider structuring or restructuring your affairs, as part of any settlement. Opportunities exist with sage advice concerning Companies, Trusts, Family Trusts, Self-Managed Superfunds and/or the establishment of Child Maintenance Trusts or Education Funds.
A skilled lawyer can help align such structuring with your strategic vision (as achieved above) to explore possible options to benefit the family as a whole, and utilise tax strategies to relieve some of the financial pressures that can be placed on the two households.
An experienced financial neutral will provide a ‘cashflow’ comparison, between what’s current and the new options available. This often will bring parties closer together, in a joint endeavour to place the children first.
Solution:
An experienced financial neutral can compare offers between the parties using financial software. This will show the effects of your cashflow when considering income versus expenditure and the effect of the property division, over a stipulated length of time. This may be 1-3 years and then 5 and 10, through to retirement.
The Financial neutral can provide vital data regarding the long-term effect a ‘super split’ will have on a client. For example, a superannuation split of $200,000 now, might be as little as an additional $100 per week until retirement (10 or more years down the track) in order to get  back in the same position, had the split not occurred. This could also free up more of the non-superannuation assets available to that party.
An experienced Financial Neutral is specifically trained in this area and understands what is helpful to you and what information is required by your Lawyer. Such information provided prior, is critical in any negotiations prior to and during a mediation.
In many cases the savings and benefits that can be obtained, by a careful and considered approach to settlement, provide the parties with certainty for many years into the future, along with securing the needs of any children.
The post How a Financial Neutral can Assist Separating Clients with Difficult Decisions appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

How the New Residential Tenancy Regulation may Affect Sales and Purchases

The Queensland Government has recently passed the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation (COVID-19 Emergency Response) Regulation (“the Regulation”) which is designed to provide additional protections to landlords and tenants during the COVID-19 emergency response period (which is currently due to expire on 31 December 2020).
The Regulation overrides a number the provisions of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (to the extent of any inconsistency) while it remains in force – including (among other things):

providing that a landlord can’t (between 29/3/20 and 29/9/20) terminate a tenancy agreement due to the tenant’s failure to pay rent if the tenant couldn’t pay the rent as it was suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency;
extending existing fixed term agreements that were due to end on or before 29/9/20  to 30/9/20 if the tenant is suffering from excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency;
allowing a tenant to apply to the Tribunal to terminate the agreement if they are suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency and haven’t been able to reach a conciliation agreement with the landlord;
allowing a tenant to terminate their tenancy agreement if they believe that they can’t safely occupy the premises because of domestic violence;
providing that a landlord can’t give a notice to leave without grounds if the tenant is suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency;
limiting the landlord’s ability to claim reletting costs from the tenant;
limiting the landlord’s ability to recover unpaid rent if the tenant is suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency; and
limiting the landlord’s ability to enter the premises (e.g. to inspect and show it to prospective buyers and tenants) if it, or any person in the premises, is subject to a quarantine direction, anyone staying in the premises is a vulnerable person or if entry would contravene a public health direction.

Note that the above is not an exhaustive list of the amendments provided for in the Regulation and you should refer to our “New Emergency Residential Tenancy Provisions Due to COVID-19 Emergency” article on our website for more details on the amended provisions.
The Regulation will not only affect the dealings between landlords and tenants, but may also affect residential sales and purchases. For example:

the above moratorium on evictions, extension of fixed term agreements, increased ability for tenants to terminate, reduced ability for a landlords to claim reletting costs and restrictions on addressing unpaid rent may result in buyers being less inclined to purchase tenanted properties as investments;
the limits on landlord’s right to inspect may make it more difficult for them to market and sell the property;
the limits on inspections may also make it more difficult for buyers to undertake any inspections it may require; and
the moratorium on evictions, extension of fixed term agreements and restrictions on termination due to unpaid rent may affect:

​the seller’s ability to provide a buyer with vacant possession; and
the buyer’s ability to claim some duty concessions (e.g. principal place of residence and first home concessions).

Please feel free to contact our Property Law team if you have any queries in relation to the new residential tenancy provisions and how they may affect your property or any possible sale or purchase.
The post How the New Residential Tenancy Regulation may Affect Sales and Purchases appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

New Emergency Residential Tenancy Provisions Due to COVID-19 Emergency

The Queensland Government passed the COVID-19 Emergency Response Act on 22 April 2020. This Act allows Ministers to make extraordinary Regulations that override other legislation if they are satisfied that the Regulations are necessary for the COVID-19 Emergency Response Act’s purposes.
The Government subsequently passed the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation (COVID-19 Emergency Response) Regulation (“the Regulation”) which is designed to provide additional protections to landlords and tenants during the COVID-19 emergency response period (which is currently due to expire on 31 December 2020).  While in force, the Regulation will override the provisions of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (“the Act”) in a number of areas.
EXCESSIVE HARDSHIP
It should firstly be noted that a number of the protections given to the tenant only apply if the tenant has suffered an “excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency” – the Regulation provides that this occurs if during the COVID-19 emergency period:

any of the following apply:

the tenant (or anyone else in their care) suffers from COVID-19;
the tenant is subject to a quarantine direction;
the tenant’s place of employment is closed, or their employer’s business is restricted, because of a public health direction;
the tenant is self-isolating because they are a vulnerable person (or they live with or are the primary carer for a vulnerable person);
a restriction on travel imposed by a public health direction (or other law) prevents the tenant from working or returning home; or
the COVID-19 emergency prevents the tenant from leaving or returning to Australia;

and

the tenant:

suffers a loss of income of 25% or more; or
the rent payable under the tenancy agreement is 30% or more of the tenant’s income

(noting that if there is more than one tenant, the above percentages apply to the combined income of all of the tenants).
AMENDMENTS TO ACT
The Regulation amends a number of the provisions of the Act, so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of the Regulation, while the Regulation remains in force:
Moratorium on Evictions
From 29 March 2020 to the later of 29 September 2020 and the last day of the COVID-19 emergency period, a landlord can’t evict a tenant for failure to pay rent if that failure relates to the tenant suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency.
It’s important to note however that the Regulation provides that this moratorium doesn’t prevent the landlord ending the tenancy agreement:

for any reason other than failure to pay rent;
for failure to pay rent that was not related to the tenant suffering excessive hardship; or
if the landlord gave a notice to leave before 29 March 2020.

Extension of Fixed Term Agreements
If:

the tenancy is an existing fixed term tenancy agreement that ends on or before 29 September 2020; and
the tenant is suffering from excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency

the landlord must, before the end of the current term, offer to extend the term to 30 September 2020 (or any earlier date requested by the tenant) and the tenancy will then continue until the extended date on the same terms.
This provision does not however apply if:

the fixed term agreement ended before the Regulation commenced; or
the landlord gave a valid notice to leave before the commencement of the section (or the tenant gave a valid notice of intention to leave before that date).

Note that this extension provision does not prevent the ending of the tenancy agreement under the relevant provisions of the Act (subject to the limitations of the Regulation).
Ending Tenancy Agreements
TERMINATION BY LANDLORD
The Regulation now allows a landlord to give the tenant notice to leave (noting it must however give at least 2 months’ notice – but that this can now be earlier than the end of a fixed term agreement) if:

the landlord is preparing to sell the premises and the preparation requires the premises to be vacant;
the landlord has entered into a Contract requiring vacant possession;
the landlord, or a member of their immediate family, needs to occupy the premises; or
the premises are required for use under a program administered by the State.

Landlords are however prohibited from giving any information in the notice that is false and misleading and can’t let the premises to a person under another tenancy agreement.
The Regulation also prohibits the landlord giving the tenant a notice to leave without grounds if the tenant is (or has been) suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency (and any notice given is of no effect until the end of the emergency period).
TERMINATION BY TENANT
A tenant can now give a notice of intention to leave, within 7 days after they first occupy the premises, if the premises are not in good repair, are unfit to live in or do not comply with a prescribed minimum housing standard (unless that condition was caused by a breach of the agreement by the tenant).
If:

the tenant is suffering excessive hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency; and
the parties have not been able to reach a conciliation agreement in dispute resolution procedures

the tenant can apply to the Tribunal to terminate the tenancy agreement.
RELETTING COSTS
The Regulation only allows tenancy agreements to include a provision requiring the tenant to pay the landlord’s costs in reletting the premises if:

it is a fixed term agreement;
the tenant is only made liable if it terminates the agreement in a way not permitted under the Regulation; and
the payment is limited to the landlord’s reasonable costs.

However, any reletting costs provision is void if the agreement is ended because of a termination order, a notice ending residency under the new domestic violence provisions (see below) or a notice by the tenant because of the condition of the property (see above).
Further, if the tenant suffers a loss of income of 75% or more and the tenant has less than $5,000 in savings (combined if there is more than one tenant), the tenant is only liable to pay reletting costs equal to one week’s rent.
Unpaid Rent
If the rent is overdue by at least 7 days but the landlord knows (or ought reasonably know) that the tenant  is suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency, the landlord can’t serve a notice to remedy breach, but can give a show cause notice to pay the unpaid rent.
If a tenant receives a show cause notice for unpaid rent, within 14 days it must either pay the rent or advise the landlord that it is suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency.
If the tenant informs the landlord that it is suffering excessive hardship, the landlord can ask the tenant to enter into a tenancy variation agreement.  A tenancy variation agreement can cover rent reduction for a stated period or a payment plan for unpaid rent.  Note that the rent increase provisions of the Act don’t apply to an increase in rent at the end of the term of the variation agreement. If the parties can’t reach agreement on the terms of any tenancy variation agreement, either party can request dispute resolution in relation to the unpaid rent.
If the tenant does not pay the unpaid rent or give notice of excessive hardship within the 14 days, the Landlord can then serve a notice to remedy breach.
Note also that if an application is made to the Tribunal for a termination order because of unpaid rent, the Tribunal can’t grant the application if the rent was unpaid because the tenant has been suffering excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency.
Entry to Premises
The landlord (or its agent) mustn’t enter the premises (and the tenant can refuse entry):

to inspect;
for repairs or maintenance (or to inspect repairs or maintenance undertaken);
to show the premises to a prospective buyer or tenant;
to allow a valuation of the premises;
if the landlord thinks the premises has been abandoned; or
to inspect to see if the tenant has remedied a breach after a notice to remedy a breach has been given

if

the landlord (or its agent) is subject to a quarantine direction;
any person at the premises is subject to a quarantine direction;
the tenant refuses entry because the tenant, or anyone staying at the premises, is a vulnerable person; or
entry would contravene a public health direction.

The landlord can also refuse to enter the premises (e.g. if it believes any of the above apply).
If the landlord wishes to enter the premises to inspect it or show it to a prospective buyer or tenant, but the tenant refuses entry because they (or another person at the premises) is a vulnerable person, the tenant must allow the Landlord to undertake the inspection by virtual inspection, video conferencing or by the tenant giving the landlord access to photographs or video (of sufficient quality to enable the landlord to judge the condition of the property) of the premises.
Repairs and Maintenance
If the landlord’s obligation to maintain and repair under the Act:

is inconsistent with a public health directive or social distancing; or
would require the landlord to enter the premises but it is no longer able to (see above)

the landlord is released from the obligation (to the extent of the inconsistency) until the earlier of the date the obligation stops being inconsistent with the public health direction or social distancing and the date the COVID-19 emergency period ends.
The landlord is also released from the obligation until necessary tradespeople or supplies are available (or the COVID-19 emergency period ends), if they are not available at the time the repair and maintenance obligation arose.
Note that the landlord is still however required to make emergency repairs.
Domestic Violence
If a tenant believes that they can no longer safely occupy the premises because of domestic violence against them, the Regulation now allows them to terminate the tenancy agreement.  When giving notice, the tenant must however give the landlord supporting evidence – e.g. protection order, injunction for personal protection under the Family Law Act or a report about domestic violence from a doctor, social worker, refuge or crises worker, domestic and family violence support worker or case manager, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander medical service or solicitor.
If the landlord receives a notice ending the tenancy under these provisions, it must advise the tenant who gave it:

whether the landlord intends to apply to the Tribunal to have the notice set aside because it does not comply with the requirements of the Regulation; and
if there are other tenants under the tenancy agreement:

that the other tenants will be informed that the tenant gave the notice – and when the other tenants will be given this notice; and
that the agreement continues for the other tenants.

If the landlord does not believe that the requirements of the Regulation have been met by the tenant, it can apply to the Tribunal to set aside the notice – which it must do within 7 days of receiving the notice.  The Tribunal will hear this application as an urgent matter.
If the tenant that gives this notice is the sole tenant under the agreement, the agreement will end 7 days after the notice is given by the tenant (or the date it hands over vacant possession if that is earlier).
The Regulation also allows the tenant to make an application to the Tribunal seeking termination of the tenancy agreement (or so far as it relates to them) because of domestic violence committed against them.
Under the Regulation, the vacating tenant is not liable for costs incurred by the landlord in reletting the premises.
The Regulation also provides that:

the tenant’s obligations to keep the premises clean and not to damage it, don’t apply to the extent that the obligations would require the tenant to repair, or compensate the landlord for, damage caused by domestic violence experienced by the tenant; and
the tenant can change the locks to the premises (so long as they use a qualified tradesperson or locksmith) if they believe it is necessary to protect themselves (or another occupant) from domestic violence.

Tenancy Database
The Regulation prohibits a user from listing personal information relating to a failure to pay rent or the ending of a tenancy agreement in a tenancy data base if the failure or termination happened during the COVID-19 emergency period and was because the person suffered excessive hardship because of the COVID-19 emergency or was complying with a public health direction (unless the tenant didn’t advise the landlord that the failure or termination was for these reasons).
HOW THE REGULATION MAY AFFECT PURCHASES AND SALES
The provisions of the Regulation will not only affect the dealings between the landlord and tenant, but may also affect a sale and purchase of the property.
For example,

the above moratorium on evictions, extension of fixed term agreements, increased ability for tenants to terminate, reduced ability for landlords to claim reletting costs and restrictions on addressing unpaid rent may result in buyers being less inclined to purchase tenanted properties as investments;
the limits on landlord’s right to inspect may make it more difficult to market and sell the property and for any buyer to undertake any inspections it may require; and
the moratorium on evictions, extension of fixed term agreements and restrictions on termination due to unpaid rent may affect:

the ability to provide a buyer with vacant possession; and
a buyer’s ability to claim duty concessions (e.g. principal place of residence and first home concessions).

Please feel free to contact our Property Law team if you have any queries in relation to the new residential tenancy provisions and how they may affect your property.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post New Emergency Residential Tenancy Provisions Due to COVID-19 Emergency appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Best Lawyers in Australia, 2021 Edition

Murdoch Lawyers is proud to announce that Special Counsel, John Lobban, has been listed in three areas of practice.
Best Lawyers is an international publication listing those practitioners who are recognised by their industry peers as leaders in their areas of practice.
Almost without exception, these lawyers are based in our capital cities. Murdoch Lawyers is proud to announce that Special Counsel, John Lobban, is the only regionally based lawyer to be recognised in three disciplines; Litigation, Class Actions, and Insolvency and Reorganisation Law.
Having practiced for three decades in a leading international firm, John jined us in Toowoomba in 2020. He is increasingly advising rural and regional businesses in all aspects of dispute resolution and debt and equity restructuring, providing first tier expertise without the capital city expense.
Combined with his acknowledged governance and regulatory skills, John continues to give clear concise and pragmatic advice to our business clients in an increasingly difficult economic climate.
View the listings on the Best Lawyers website here.
The post Best Lawyers in Australia, 2021 Edition appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Business Alert – Amendments To Modern Awards

The Clerks- Private Sector Award 2010 (the Clerks Award) has been varied to provide for greater operational flexibility in the face of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The changes commenced on 28 March 2020 and will operate until 30 June 2020 unless extended.
The amendments allow employees to be directed to perform duties within their skill and competency regardless of their classification provided the duties are safe, the employee is qualified to perform the duties and there is no reduction in pay. Provision has also been made for employees to work from home.
Part time and casual employees now have a 2 hour minimum period of engagement when working from home. Full time employees can request to work from home and the spread of ordinary hours has been extended from 6am to 11pm Monday to Friday and 7am to 12.30pm on Saturdays.
Full time and part time employees can agree to a temporary reduction in hours for a specified period of time for the whole or part of the workplace if 75% of the relevant employees vote in favour of the reduction. However, the reduction in hours cannot be more than 25 percent. Employees will continue to accrue entitlements at their ordinary hours of work prior to the agreement to reduce hours.
An employee can be directed to take accrued annual leave with 1 weeks’ notice, or less by agreement, provided the employer considers the employee’s personal circumstances. Agreement can be made to take twice as much annual leave at a proportionally reduced rate of pay for all or part of the period of leave.
Employers are able to close down operations or direct employees to take annual leave or unpaid leave if the employee does not have enough accrued leave by giving 1 weeks’ notice
Separate to these Award amendments an employer and an individual employee can still agree to reduce hours or for the employee to temporarily change from full time to part time hours.
The Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 (the Hospitality Award) and the Restaurant Industry Award 2010 (the Restaurant Award) have also been amended to allow for:

a change in duties similar to the Clerks Award;
a reduction of hours of work between 22.8 to 38 ordinary hours per week for full time employees and between 60 to 100% of part time employees’ usual weekly hours over the roster cycle (subject to consultation obligations);
employees to be directed to take annual leave and the ability to take leave at half pay.

The Restaurant Award also has the ability to effect a close down on the same terms as the Clerks Award.
From 8 April 2020 some 99 other modern awards have been amended until 30 June 2020 with the addition of Schedule X which gives employees the ability to take 2 weeks unpaid pandemic leave and annual leave at half pay. Further changes to modern awards may be introduced in the face of the pandemic.
Takeaways
If you have employees covered by the Clerks Award, Hospitality Award or the Restaurant Award you should consider using this new award flexibility to assist the business navigate the impact of COVID-19.
If you have employees covered by other modern awards you should check whether Schedule X has been incorporated into the award and be aware of your additional obligations.
If you require any advice about the impact of these award amendments, or assistance managing your workforce in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, please contact Murdoch Lawyers Senior Associate Suzanne Wishart on 07 3164 1121 or 0459992236.
The post Business Alert – Amendments To Modern Awards appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Queensland Land Tax Relief Measures

On 9 April 2020 the Queensland Government announced its support package for landlords and tenants, both commercial and residential, impacted by the COVID-19 disaster.
The announced package includes:

3-month deferral of land tax liabilities for the 2020-21 assessment year.
waiver of the 2% land tax foreign surcharge for foreign entities for the 2019-20 assessment year.
land tax rebate of 25% of the 2019-2020 land tax year for eligible landlords, which is to be passed through to its tenants.
a set of leasing principles a landlord must agree to as a condition of applying for the land tax rebate.
temporary legislative changes to protect eligible tenants, including eviction moratoriums and rent freezes.
a crisis payment of $500 per week for up to four weeks in rent relief for residential tenants who are homeless, or at imminent risk of becoming homeless and have exhausted other options

Land Tax Relief
Announced available land tax relief from the Queensland Government includes:

a land tax rebate reducing land tax liabilities by 25% for eligible properties for the 2019-20 assessment year
a waiver of the 2% land tax foreign surcharge for foreign entities for the 2019-20 assessment year
a 3-month deferral of land tax liabilities for the 2020-21 assessment year.

Land tax relief applications are being managed by the Office of State Revenue. To apply visit qld.gov.au/landtax.
Automatic partial relief for foreign entities
The Queensland Office of State Revenue (“OSR”) advises that there is no need to make an application for the foreign surcharge waiver –the OSR will reassess land tax to apply the waiver and provide a refund where the assessment amount has already been paid. On the face of it, there does not appear to be any requirement at this stage to “prove” COVID-19 impacts have affected the property owner.
Automatic 3 month deferral of payment of the 2020-2021 land tax assessments
It appears the deferral of payment of the assessment for the 2020-2021 land tax year will take place automatically as well with the OSR advising there is no need to make an application. Because there is no need to make an application it would seem that there is no requirement to establish COVID-19 impacts have affected the property owner.
Applications required for the 25% rebate of 2019-2020 land tax
The OSR advises that it will be necessary to make an application for the land tax 25% rebate for the 2019-20 assessment year. Eligible landlords must apply for the 25% rebate BEFORE 30 June 2020.
Commercial and residential landlords are eligible to apply for the 25% rebate for the 2019-2020 land tax assessment if either:

The landlord leases all or part of a property to one or more tenants and all the following apply:

(a) the ability of one or more tenants to pay their normal rent is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; and
(b) the landlord agrees to provide rent relief to the affected tenant(s) of an amount at least commensurate with the land tax relief; and
(c) the landlord agrees that it will comply with the leasing principles  (see below) even if the relevant lease is not regulated.
or

 The affected landlord:

(a) has all or part of its property is available for lease; and
(b) the landlord’s ability to secure a tenant(s) has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; and
(c) the landlord requires relief to meet its financial obligations; and
(d) the landlord agrees to comply with the leasing principles even if the relevant lease is not regulated.
If a landlord is eligible for the land tax rebate under both the above circumstances (i.e. eligible landlords have some property leased and some property vacant), the OSR expects the landlord to apply the rebate paid firstly to provide rent relief to the landlord’s tenants. Landlords are then able to apply any remaining rebate to their own financial obligations (e.g. in relation to debt and other expenses).
The land tax rebate will only apply to each property that meets the above eligibility requirements and conditions, rather than the rebate applying to a property owner’s entire taxable landholdings.
Where there are multiple tenants for a single property, including mixed-use developments, if the eligibility requirements and conditions are met for at least one tenancy, then the whole property is eligible for the land tax rebate.
The OSR advises that the land tax rebate does not need to be repaid if the eligibility requirements and conditions are met.
Leasing Principles
To be eligible for the 25% land tax rebate a landowner must commit to comply with the leasing principles set out below. As there is no need to make an application for either the deferral of the 2020-2021 land tax payment or the waiver of the 2% foreign surcharge it is hard to see how the announced leasing principles can be intended to be a pre-requirement for those forms of land tax relief.
The leasing principles are to be introduced into Queensland law – this cannot happen until Parliament resumes sitting on 28 April 2020, so clarification on the grey areas may take some time!
The announced principles for residential landlords are:

You will negotiate in good faith with your tenant to seek a mutually agreeable resolution if their ability to pay is impacted by COVID-19;
You will not evict your tenant if they are in financial distress and unable to meet their commitments due to the impact of COVID-19;
You will not end a tenancy for any reason other than on an approved ground; this does not include the tenant’s inability to pay rent or the end of a fixed term lease;
You will not charge break lease fees for tenants who need to end a fixed term tenancy early due to the financial, health or personal safety impacts of COVID-19; and
You will allow a tenant to refuse entry for non-essential reasons, including routine repairs and inspections, particularly if a member of the household has a higher risk profile if exposed to COVID-19.

The announced principles for commercial landlords are:

You will negotiate in good faith with your tenant to seek a mutually agreeable resolution if their ability to pay is impacted by COVID-19;
You will not evict your tenant if they are in financial distress and unable to meet their commitments due to the impact of COVID-19;
You will not increase rent, except where rent is linked to increased turnover;
You will not penalise a tenant who stops trading or reduces opening hours;
You will not charge any interest on unpaid or deferred rent; and
You will not make a claim on a bank guarantee or security deposit for non-payment of rent.

There has already been strong concerns raised by the property industry and the real estate sales industry about aspects of the announced principles. With enabling legislation still to be passed strong lobbying by these peak bodies can be expected.
Relief for Commercial and Residential Tenants
These announced measures are still subject to enabling legislation being introduced and passed by the Queensland Government. We will review the proposed legislation when it is introduced and comment at that time.
Questions?
For assistance with any questions you have about the announced Land Tax relief measures, please contact our Commercial Property Team.
The post Queensland Land Tax Relief Measures appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

COVID-19 Commercial Rent Relief Measures

The new MANDATORY Code of Conduct for rent relief for commercial leases where Tenants (and Landlords) are affected by COVID-19. The Code of Conduct was released by the Prime Minister’s Office today.
Key Points
Who is affected?

The Code only applies where a Tenant or Landlord qualifies for JobKeeper programme from the Commonwealth. That is:

turnover under $50 Million; AND
experiencing at least a 30% reduction in turnover.

For franchisees, the impacted turnover is calculated at the franchisee level.
The government is asking that Landlords apply the same principles to Tenants that do not qualify for the Job-Keeper programme.

Rent Relief

Rent relief applies for affected Tenants from 3 April 2020 until the government declares the JobKeeper programme ends.
There needs to be transparency in dealings between the Landlord and the Tenant. Tenants can be required to provide “sufficient and accurate information”. This-includes information generated from an accounting system and information provided to and/or received from a financial institution.
Relief is based on proportionality –the rent relief is to be in the same proportion as the reduction in turnover of the affected Tenant.
At least 50% of the rent relief is required to be a complete waiver of the applicable rent (this cannot be subsequently recouped by the Landlord).
The remaining 50% of the rent relief granted is to be amortised over the remaining term of the lease BUT where there is less than 24 months of the lease term remaining the Tenant must be given at least 24 months to repay the rent relief. How this is achieved is open to negotiation between the Landlord and the Tenant
No fees, interest or other charges is to be applied to the rent waived or deferred.
Rent increases are frozen during the period of the pandemic.
No penalties can be applied for reduced opening hours by Tenants during the pandemic.
Landlords should pass through to Tenants benefits they receive from Landlord’s banks during the pandemic.
Landlords must not draw on a Tenant’s security for the non-payment of rent (cash bonds, bank guarantees or personal guarantees) during the period of the pandemic and a reasonable subsequent recovery period.
Tenants are able to (but not obliged to) extend their lease for an equivalent period of the rent waiver and/or deferral period.

Compulsory Mediation

Where Landlords and Tenants cannot reach agreement on leasing arrangements (as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic), the matter is to be referred and subjected (by either party) to applicable state or territory retail/commercial leasing dispute resolution processes for binding mediation.
Landlords and Tenants must not use mediation processes to prolong or frustrate the facilitation of amicable resolution outcomes.

Document, Document, Document!!

Inevitably, people’s recollection of arrangements agreed decay over time.
The only sure way to minimise the chance of an expensive dispute later is to document the agreement reached.
An experienced property lawyer can assist in avoiding unintentional ambiguities or missed key points.

Our Commercial Property team is ready to assist with any questions and assist with negotiation and documentation of arrangements reached.
The post COVID-19 Commercial Rent Relief Measures appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Insolvency – Recent Changes & What You Need To Know

There have been a number of recent changes to laws in the corporate insolvency area which will affect company directors and the businesses they run. Given the anticipated large scale disruption to business by COVID-19, and which disruption has the potential to cause significant solvency issues over the coming weeks and months, we provide a brief outline below of some of the more important changes which may be worth keeping in mind:

The “safe harbour” legislation and insolvent trading: These laws give company directors an opportunity to exempt themselves from incurring personal liability as a result of insolvent trading by their company. The exception will apply where the director(s) can evidence that they are developing a course of action which is ‘reasonably likely’ to lead to a ‘better outcome’ for their company than administration or liquidation. There are a number of key things which need to be done in order for the “safe harbour” exception to be available to a company director, including ensuring that proper books and records are kept and obtaining advice from ‘appropriately qualified’ advisors. Importantly, and as a result of COVID-19, the Federal Government intends to shortly pass new legislation that temporarily relieves company directors from personal liability for trading whilst insolvent in relation to debts incurred in the ordinary course of business during the next 6 months. However, the company itself will still be liable for the debts incurred, and egregious cases of dishonesty and fraud will remain subject to criminal penalties.
Debt recovery changes – COVID-19: The Federal Government intends to shortly make temporary changes to insolvency laws as part of a raft of measures directed to softening the economic impact, and likely difficulties with business and cashflow, as a result of the COVID-19. Of particular note are the following changes to debt recovery procedures, and which changes will be in place for the next 6 months:
the minimum threshold debt amount for creditors to issue statutory demands to companies will be lifted from $2,000 to $20,000.
if a statutory demand is issued to a company for a debt of at least $20,000, then the time for that company to comply with the statutory demands will be increased from 21 days to 6 months.
the minimum threshold judgment debt amount for creditors to issue bankruptcy notices to individuals will be lifted from $5,000 to $20,000.
if a bankruptcy notice is issued to an individual for a debt of at least $20,000, then the time for that individual to comply with the bankruptcy notice will be increased from 21 days to 6 months.

The above changes do not affect a creditor’s right to take legal action in the Courts for outstanding debts due and owing, whether against either a company or an individual.

New “Phoenixing” laws: Legislation was passed in February 2020 giving ASIC and others greater powers to detect and combat phoenixing, and to prosecute company directors and professional advisors who engage or assist in phoenixing. In short, phoenixing is the deliberate stripping and transferring of company assets to another entity, leaving the original company without the means to pay its debts, including money owed to employees. The new laws have strengthened the powers of ASIC and liquidators to recover assets “phoenixed” out of a company prior to liquidation. A new concept known as a ‘creditor defeating disposition’ has been introduced, making it an offence for company directors to engage in conduct which has the effect of disposing of assets of a company where the company subsequently enters external administration within the following 12 months. The disposition can be set aside, and the company director faces penalties which can include substantial fines, jail, and having to personally compensate the company for any loss.
New GST personal liability for directors: Up until recently, company directors, in certain circumstances, could only be held personally liable by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) for non-payment of a company’s PAYG and superannuation obligations. New laws starting from 1 April 2020 have now extended that personal liability to directors for the non-payment of GST by a company. The liability is incurred by the ATO issuing the director with a Director Penalty Notice (DPN) for unpaid GST and, like the position for PAYG and superannuation, where the company has lodged its activity statements within 3 months of the due dates, the director can avoid personal liability by placing the company into external administration (voluntary administration or liquidation) with 21 days of the DPN being issued or causing the company to pay the outstanding GST.  Where the company has failed to pay GST and has not lodged its activity statements, then a “lockdown” DPN is issued by the ATO, and the director cannot avoid personal liability for the GST, even if the company is placed into external administration.
Director resignations: The backdating of director resignations by more than 28 days has now been stopped, unless a court or ASIC approve otherwise.  A director resignation will now take effect only from the date the resignation document is lodged with ASIC, or within a maximum of 28 days before that lodgment. In the past, some directors attempted to avoid potential liability by significantly backdating their resignation date.  This “loophole” has now been closed.
Superannuation amnesty: The ATO has recently announced an amnesty for all eligible employers who may not have paid the correct amount of superannuation to their employees between 1 July 1992 and 31 March 2018. The amnesty runs to (at the moment) 11:59pm on 7 September 2020. If a superannuation shortfall is disclosed and paid (with interest) by an eligible employer, then no charges or penalties will be applied by the ATO. In addition, payments of superannuation made to the ATO before the end of the amnesty period will be tax deductible. Employers who do not take advantage of the amnesty will face significant charges and penalties when pursued by the ATO.

Key takeaway
In the current economic climate, company directors need to develop an early, clear strategy and plan to manage the issues that may arise over the next 6 months, including in respect to the solvency of their business. The matters discussed in this update should be taken into account as part of any strategy and plan developed.
If you would like more information or advice about the matters raised above, please contact our insolvency and litigation experts at Murdoch Lawyers on (07) 4616 9898.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post Insolvency – Recent Changes & What You Need To Know appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

I Own Property with My Spouse/Family Member. Should I have a Property Co-Ownership Agreement in Place?

It is commonplace nowadays for property to be purchased with another party such as a friend or family member. Due to the intimate nature of the relationship, an informal understanding is usually reached about what would happen in certain circumstances, without this ever being put into writing. At best, we are finding that co-owners will update their Wills to take the property into consideration, should one of the co-owners unexpectedly die, and leave it at that.
But is this enough to protect your interests?
If you currently co-own property with a friend or family member, have you considered what would happen if:

all co-owners wish to sell the property?
one of the co-owners wishes to sell and the other does not?
there is a disagreement regarding paying outgoings for the property, such as rates, insurance, ongoing repairs and maintenance; or
over the course of owning the property, one co-owner has paid an amount over and above their registered interest in the property (e.g. one co-owner paid for a shed to be constructed on the property)?

More importantly, if you have considered the above factors, do you have a legally enforceable document in place to record your mutual understanding with the other co-owner/s? If not, you may wish to consider a Property Co-ownership Agreement.
Simply put, a Property Co-ownership Agreement helps co-owners protect their investment by outlining the “ground rules” for how the property will be managed if certain situations take place.
A Co-ownership Agreement becomes crucial if there is an Incapacity
Incapacity is a serious concern for multiple reasons, one of which is the following scenario, which unfortunately is becoming increasingly common.

Mark (77yrs) and Susan (70yrs) have been in a relationship for the past 5 years
Both of them have children from previous relationships who are appointed as their attorneys in the event that they lose capacity
Mark and Susan decide to sell their own properties, and use these funds to purchase a new property together as 50/50 equal owners
They each sign a new Will to give the surviving owner the right to continue to reside in the Property after the other’s death, whilst transferring the deceased’s 50% interest in the property to their own biological children

However, this alone is insufficient for protecting their interests. In this circumstance, the terms of Mark and Susan’s Wills will not be of any relevance nor will they provide any protection if one of them loses capacity and his/her decisions are being made by their children as their financial attorneys.
Say Susan then loses capacity and her children (acting as her attorneys) force a sale of the property, where does this leave Mark?
In situations such as this, a Co-Ownership Agreement could have contained provisions which acknowledge that the surviving spouse has the right to continue to occupy the property as their principal place of residence (rent free) for as long as they wish, regardless of the other party losing capacity and needing to relocate (as well as their death).
If you wish to discuss your circumstances or would like to set up a Co-Ownership Agreement, contact our experienced estate planning team today on 1300 068 736.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post I Own Property with My Spouse/Family Member. Should I have a Property Co-Ownership Agreement in Place? appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Covid-19 – Changes to Insolvency Laws Come into Effect

Our recent article outlined proposed changes to insolvency laws as part of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Those changes have now come into effect, as the Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Act 2020 received royal assent and passed into law on 24 March 2020.
To recap, the position, now and for (at least) the next 6 months, is that, inter alia:

The minimum debt thresholds for issuing statutory demands to companies or bankruptcy notices to individual debtors have been lifted to $20,000 in each case;
The time for compliance with statutory demands (in the case of companies) and bankruptcy notices (in the case of individuals) issued on or after 25 March 2020 has been extended to 6 months;
Directors of companies are temporarily (for the next 6 months) relieved from personal liability for trading whilst insolvent in relation to debts incurred in the ordinary course of business – however the company will still be liable for the debts incurred and egregious cases of dishonesty and fraud will remain subject to criminal penalties. It is also to be noted that there is otherwise no effect on the requirement for directors in all other respects to continue to comply with their statutory and general law duties.
Creditors are still able to pursue debt recovery and enforcement action through the Courts.

If you would like more information then please contact Murdoch Lawyers on (07) 4616 9898.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post Covid-19 – Changes to Insolvency Laws Come into Effect appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

7 Things to Consider Before Agreeing to a Solar or Wind Farm on Your Property

In recent times some of our agricultural and pastoral land owners have been approached by proponents for solar or wind farms wanting to take options to lease part of their property for a green energy project.
Here are some tips and observations that we have learned through assisting our clients deal with these proposals.
What Solar Farm proponents are looking for:

A site that is within a 2-5km radius of substations as there is too much loss of the produced electricity if the site is located further than 5km.
An area where there is spare local grid capacity, at the moment in Queensland this means:

the Darling Downs – there is excellent spare capacity (3,000MW) with a strong existing network and proximity to SEQ load centre and the NSW 330kV interconnector;
the Fitzroy Region – there is also good spare capacity (2,000MW) and a strong network and good access to load centres in Central and Southern Queensland with scope for additional space capacity when coal generated power is retired; and
to a lesser degree, Northern Queensland (including Townsville) and the Isaac Region – both of these areas have good spare capacity but have some issues with effective interconnection/ sharing of capacity with areas outside their regions.

Minimal shading – you are not going to get a proponent to put their site on that pesky piece of protected vegetation that you would like removed.

7 factors you should consider if you are approached to sign an option to lease your property to a green energy proponent

You are probably not the only one being invited to the dance, so:

beware of tying up your land under long term options:

Spare capacity in the grid is finite. It is a race by proponents to get their project approved and take up the spare capacity before competitors do.
There will most likely be competing proponents interested in getting a foothold in the area.
A proponent wanting to sign you up to an option to lease does not necessarily mean the proponent is keen to develop on your property. The proponent may just be taking a blocking position on your land to keep other proponents out of the area while the proponent works on its preferred site.

You should ask for up-front money for the grant of the lease option to at least cover your legal costs. There is no certainty that your land will ultimately be the parcel that gets an approval to construct but you will certainly incur costs reviewing and negotiating the proposed terms.
Up-front money for the grant of a lease option also recognises the opportunity cost to you. The opportunity cost is a way of describing the risk you take in dealing with this particular proponent as you cannot deal with more than one proponent at a time, and there is no saying which, if any, proponent will be successful.
The nature of these situations seems to be “all or nothing” – it is unlikely that two competing proponents both proceed in an area that has suitable substation access to an area of the grid with spare capacity.

While the power generated may be “green” there will be a lot of hard infrastructure built on your property that may impact operations on other parts of your property. Proponents will want the opportunity to store power on-site so that it can be supplied to the grid at times of peak demand. You also need to consider the possible impact of having large storage batteries on your land in addition to the solar panels or wind turbines, storage depots and access roadways.
Projects are often optioned by an enterprising entrepreneur to be eventually on-sold to a larger aggregator or operator who actually has the financial capacity to build the project. The company you are negotiating with is quite possibly not going to be the one that builds and operates the power plant on your property.
Negotiating a green power lease option is very different from CSG or mining compensation.

Unlike having CSG or mining leases on your land, because there is no element of you being forced to give over use of part of your land for the development, there is no statute or court based means of deciding what equals fair compensation. Put simply, there is no umpire to decide if the deal you are offered is fair or in your long term interests.
You need to approach the option and the lease proposed by the green energy operator like you would a commercial property deal.
All green energy proponents that we at Murdoch Lawyers have dealt with have a number of fixed terms that they feel they are not negotiable. These are issues that will impact the ability of the company that eventually undertakes the proposed project to secure funding for the project. These issues are known in the industry as “bankability” issues.
In the UK, deals with land owners are sometimes linked to a share of electricity profits generated above a minimum base output from the project, so the owner shares in the upside of technological advances. We have not seen any enthusiasm for this so far from proponents and most seem to regard this as a bankability issue.

The lease term, rent reviews and contributions to rates and land tax, need to be considered carefully before being agreed upon.

Proponents typically want a 30 year lease with fixed rent increases or increases in rent only in line with CPI rises throughout the 30 year period. This seems to be a key “bankability” requirement.
While the starting rent usually seems attractive initially, history tells us that property values have generally increased at much greater rates than the cost of living. If this happens and the lease does not allow a review for the rent to catch up, then the value of your property investment may decrease because it is likely the property will be valued as a commercial investment (not a farm) and most commercial leases provide for some sort of rent review to fair market every 5 to 10 years.
Having the tenant pay for rates and land tax is important because the change in nature of use from rural to power generation will likely change the rating and land tax treatment of the property, significantly increasing these charges.
Proponents don’t usually raise this, but most (if not all) deals contain a “termination for convenience” clause that allows the operator to break the lease, without penalty, if it feels it is impacted by changes in its circumstances. The effect of this is to change your 30 year lease to a lease that binds the land owner for up to 30 years but can be ended by the tenant on 6 months’ notice without penalty for early termination.

If your property is used as security for bank loans you need to be careful not to commit to a deal until the bank has approved it because:

your bank may not agree to the lease if it feels the deal may reduce the value of the property in the long term; and
due to the bankability issues, generally leases to green energy operators are only suitable if the land owner has no debt or the property is owned in a superannuation fund.

The green energy operator usually does not want to give any form of guarantee for payment of the rent or for end of lease clean up obligations. Unlike mining or CSG leases, there is no reserve security amount paid to the government for the grant of the right to operate to your tenant, so there is no pool of money available to remove the solar panels or turbines if the operator fails to do so at the lease end. The clearing off of infrastructure to return the land to pastoral or agricultural use has been estimated as a significant expense.

If you have been approached with a proposal for a solar farm or wind farm to be established on your property you should get expert advice before signing any documents.
Our property team at Murdoch Lawyers have the experience and expertise to help ensure your green energy lease works for you and does not unintentionally damage your property’s value. Contact us today on 1300 068 736.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post 7 Things to Consider Before Agreeing to a Solar or Wind Farm on Your Property appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Domestic Violence and Social Distancing in the Time of Covid-19

With all this talk of COVID-19, we are hearing a lot about social distancing and isolation for our health and the health of others, but what about the impact on people facing domestic and family violence in their relationships?
There are many jokes circulating on social media suggesting that divorce lawyers are rubbing their hands together in gleeful anticipation contemplating how popular they are going to be after couples are forced to spend two weeks together in mandatory isolation. I’m married so I get it (it’s one of those, ‘it’s funny because it’s true situations).
This got me thinking though, what about a person in a domestically violent relationship? Isolation and social distancing will certainly add a whole new layer of concern and heighten the risk for that person. For this reason, now more than ever, we need to be able to identify domestic and family violence, and we need to know where our neighbours, friends or family members can go to seek help.
What is domestic and family violence?
One of the most important things to remember is that domestic violence is more than just hitting, pushing or punching another person.  In my experience, many people living in an abusive relationship will not identify it as such, unless they have been subjected to a significant amount of physical violence. This is concerning given that it is often the psychological, emotional and verbal abuse that can cause the most devastating injuries. The fact that a person is unable to recognise that they are in an abusive relationship is also a problem because it means that they are less likely to reach out to seek help to improve their situation and safety.
So, to be clear, domestic and family violence involves a wide range of behaviours used by one person in a relationship against another in order to exert power or control, cause fear, intimidate or harass. This behaviour may involve physical or sexual violence, but also involves other forms of violence including verbal abuse and repetitive insults, stalking (in person and through technology and social media), isolating someone from their family or friends, denying their access to money, preventing someone from practicing their religion, and many other acts too numerous to list. The key element though is that there is a use of power and an exercise of control over a person; and the injuries sustained can most definitely be psychological or physical (or both).
The other basic key fact to remember is that domestic violence does not discriminate. It occurs in all kinds of relationships, regardless of socio-economic status, sexual preference, race, or religion. Also, even though women are most often the victims of domestic and family violence, violence is also perpetrated by women against men, by men against other men, and by (and against) people who do not identify as any specific gender. Don’t assume that a person you know or love is not struggling in an abusive relationship on the basis that they, or their relationship, does not fit with a certain stereotype.
Where can someone experiencing domestic violence go to seek help?
In any emergency situation, always call the police on 000. Otherwise, a victim of domestic violence needs both social support and legal advice so that they can consider their options in respect to their legal protections, including making an application for a Domestic and Family Violence Protection Order.
For social support, we recommend clients start by calling 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732), or the Domestic Violence Action Centre (07 3816 3000) if they are based in the Toowoomba and Ipswich areas. These are free government funded organisations that can provide valuable support and social services, including counselling and safety planning.
For a confidential discussion in order to consider your legal options, call the Family Law team at Murdoch Lawyers today on 1300 068 736.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post Domestic Violence and Social Distancing in the Time of Covid-19 appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

Navigating the Queensland Building & Construction Commission Minimum Financial Requirements

Businesses are now feeling the impact of changes to the Minimum Financial Requirements (MFR) implemented by the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) over the past 12 months.
The MFR require QBCC licensees who hold a contractor licence to meet annual reporting obligations. However, licensees who hold a nominee supervisor or site supervisor licence are not required to meet the MFR.
The changes were implemented in two stages. Stage 1 commenced on 1 January 2019 and reintroduced the mandatory reporting requirements for all contractor licensees. Stage 2 commenced on 2 April 2019 and introduced increased reporting standards for Categories 4-7 licensees together with other reforms.
Licensees holding a contracting license were required to lodge their financial information by 31 December 2019. Failure to meet the QBCC reporting requirements could result in suspension of building licenses and significant fines.
The information provided to the QBCC must be prepared by a qualified accountant and meet the MFR Guidelines. The licensees’ net tangible assets need to be sufficient to support forecasted revenue and calculations cannot rely on certain ‘disallowed assets’. Disallowed assets presently include:

recreational vehicles
unregistered vehicles
racehorses
collectors’ items
furniture predominantly used for personal purposes
units in a trust not listed on a stock exchange
superannuation benefits that cannot be accessed by the license on the day the disallowed assets are worked out
life or income protection policy benefits
contingent assets
investments in, or shares of, a company not listed on a stock exchange
investments valued using the equity method for a special financial purpose financial statement
non-monetary credits
assets held on trust by the licensee for a beneficiary other than the licensee
an amount owing to the licensee if an invoice for the amount was issued more than 1 year before the day the disallowed assets are worked out
a deed of covenant asset for which the licensee is the covenantor

The QBCC will be monitoring net tangible assets ratios to ensure they meet the applicable licence category requirements. If a licensee provides a MFR report and does not have the net tangible assets to meet the defined amount required, they can make up the defined amount by a third party providing a Deed of Covenant and Assurance (the Covenant) to pay the defined amount if an insolvency event occurs.
The Covenant is a guarantee of the licensees’ debts if required by the QBCC. By providing a Covenant, a covenantor also charges their interest in any property they hold to secure payment of the defined amount. If an insolvency event occurs, the QBCC call in the Covenant and can take steps to sell that property to meet the charge.
The covenantor is required to obtain financial advice to produce the required financial documentation to support an application to the QBCC and then attend a lawyer for legal advice about the risks and obligations associated with being a covenantor to a contractor licensed by the QBCC.
It is important for covenantors to understand that the defined amount is not fixed and can change annually depending on the amount of turnover and the net tangible assets of the licensee.
The Covenant remains in force until extinguished by the QBCC.  A Covenant can be released if the licensor satisfies the MFR in a way that does not require reliance on the Covenant and the QBCC gives notice to the parties that this is the case, or if a further covenant is entered into by the parties.
A Covenant can only be revoked in writing by the QBCC. A covenantor should get legal advice to ensure that the QBCC properly revokes any Covenant where it is no longer required to be relied upon.
However, even when revoked, the Covenant will still apply to any obligation to pay the defined amount which might have arisen during the period the Covenant applied and which later becomes payable.
Takeaways

If your business holds a QBCC contractor license make sure a MFR report has been lodged with the QBCC. If not, take steps to lodge a report without delay.
If you do not meet the MFR, consider whether a Covenant is a suitable alternative.
If you are a licensee or a covenantor, obtain appropriate financial and legal advice before entering into any arrangements.
Remember, Covenants may be easily forgotten if they are not reviewed regularly to determine if they are still required.
If circumstances change, obtain legal advice to ensure the Covenant is properly revoked.

If you require any advice about the QBCC’s MFR or Covenants, please contact Murdoch Lawyers Director Matt Bell or Senior Associate Suzanne Wishart on 1300 068 736.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.
The post Navigating the Queensland Building & Construction Commission Minimum Financial Requirements appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.

COVID-19 – Insolvency Law Amendments To Be Introduced

Yesterday, 22 March 2020, the Federal Government announced[1] its intention to make temporary changes to insolvency laws as part of a raft of measures directed to ameliorating the economic impact, and likely difficulties with business and cashflow, as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The changes, which are expected to be in place for 6 months, include:

Lifting the minimum threshold debt amount from $2,000 to $20,000 for creditors to issue statutory demands to companies;
Extending the time for companies to comply with statutory demands from 21 days to 6 months;
Lifting the minimum threshold debt amount from $5,000 to $20,000 for creditors to issue bankruptcy notices to individual debtors;
Extending the time for compliance with bankruptcy notices from 21 days to 6 months; and
Temporarily relieving directors from personal liability for trading whilst insolvent in relation to debts incurred in the ordinary course of business (this will apply for 6 months) – however the company will still be liable for the debts incurred and egregious cases of dishonesty and fraud will remain subject to criminal penalties.

The changes have not yet come into effect, and it is not clear when these amendments will commence or whether they will operate retrospectively to any extent. However, it is expected the necessary legislation will be introduced urgently, with a view to enacting the changes as early as practicable.
If you would like more information please contact Murdoch Lawyers on (07) 4616 9898.
This publication has been carefully prepared, but it has been written in general terms and should be viewed as broad guidance only. It does not purport to be comprehensive or to render advice. No one should rely on the information contained in this publication without first obtaining professional advice relevant to their own specific situation.

[1] The Government’s factsheet can be found at here.
The post COVID-19 – Insolvency Law Amendments To Be Introduced appeared first on Murdoch Lawyers.